The Six Ages of the
Christian Church
James
R. Fisher, Jr., Ph.D.
©
February 6, 2015
NOTE:
Excerpt
from Search for the Real Parents of My
Soul
Going
to church doesn’t make you a Christian any more than going to a garage makes
you an automobile.
W.
A. Billy Sunday (1862-1935), popular outfielder in Major League Baseball, then an American evangelist.
If
the growth of modern science has taught anything in religion and in the modern
world, it is that the method of progress is the method of evolution, not the
method of revolution. Let every man
reflect well on these things before he assists in stabbing to death or in
allowing to starve to death, organized religion in the United States.
Robert
Andrews Milikan (1868-1953), American experimental physicist, Nobel Prize for
Physics in 1923 for his measurement of the elementary electronic charge and for
his work on the photoelectric effect.
American
Catholics rejoice in our separation of Church and State, and I can conceive no
combination of circumstances likely to arise which should make a union
desirable either in Church or State.
James
Gibbons (1834-1921), American Roman Catholic Cardinal from Baltimore.
Man
is not yet so transfigured that he has ceased to keep the window of his mind
and heart open towards Jerusalem, Galilee, Mecca, Canterbury, or Plymouth. The abstract proposal that we worship at any
place where God lets down the ladder is not yet an adequate substitute for the
deep desire to go up to some central sanctuary where the religious artist
vindicates a concrete universal in the realm of the spirit.
Willard
L. Sperry (1882-1954), Dean of Harvard Divinity School.
As
The Christian World Turns
We
are in a new century, the twenty-first, but the sage voices that bridged the
nineteenth and twentieth century still ring with the nostalgic message –
we are not complete within and of ourselves.
That
said, as this is being written, the Christian Church, both Roman Catholic and
Protestant, appears in disarray if not in chaos and crisis. This is no new experience for
Christians in spite of the unity and continuity of the Christian tradition.
As
the world has grown more crowded, the once enormous space between peoples,
cultures and religions has all but disappeared. Now, in this Information Age, there is less space for people but equally less space for the animal kingdom that once graced the oceans, lakes, tundra, hinterlands, deserts, mountains and valleys in bountiful numbers.
All life is collapsing in on itself with little room for man to breathe and think, or animals to roam.
Given
this development one might think man would recognize that his material side was out of control and that prudence dictated that he engage his spiritual side for insight and a return to balance, but, alas, that has not happened.
Instead,
man in his crippling hubris attempts to invent himself out of the situation
with more technology, more cerebral cognitive philosophy, more abstract
frenetic wondering that has instead successfully if not unequivocally separated his mind from his body, the material from the spiritual world.
Will this dichotomous ligation grow until man no longer has forests that reach to the heavens and
stretch across hills and mountain tops, no longer has virgin lakes and rivers
alive with species going back thousands of years, no
longer has quiet hamlets, towns and cities for man has been lost to collateral damage of constant war.
We
need a Jesus at the moment, not a god, not a divine being, not an Apostle Paul project, but a voice and a mind, as Jesus
had, which is to remind us of our sacred nature, and our latent
capacity to love unconditionally, to love ourselves so that we may in turn love
each other.
We
don’t find Jesus in Christianity as he has been locked out with our collective
obsession with the seven deadly sins.
What we have instead are billionaires, millionaires, entrepreneurs and
trendsetters, celebrities and entertainers, spin doctors and communicators, all
titillating and scintillating the material side of our nature in our frenetic dance to oblivion.
It seems appropriate, given these circumstances, to review the Six Ages of the Christian Church in the context of this
odyssey.
Each of these successive ages
in Christian history possess distinctive characteristics and facets of what we have come to call the Christian life and
culture. I will address these ages only briefly giving a little more attention to the first age, but all give palpable clues to what we are and from whence we have come, and why we have survived.
Each
of these ages lasted approximately four centuries. Each begin and ended in crisis, and each,
except the last one, passed through three distinct phrases of growth and decay.
First,
there is a period of intense spiritual activity when the church is faced with a
new historical situation and begins a new apostolate. There follows a period of achievement when
the church seems to have conquered the world and is able to create a new
Christian culture of life, art and thought.
Then there is a period of retreat and decline as the church is attacked by new
enemies from within and from without, and achievements of the second phase are
first compromised, then depreciated and finally lost.
These
successive movements of achievement and retreat suggest that the history of
Christianity is subject to a social psychological law which might go something
like this:
Inherent
in Christianity is a limiting mechanism curtailing complete spiritual
expression which prevents the individual from fulfilling his self-actualizing
needs and the church from completing its universal mission.
Before
calling this Fisher’s Law, I might confess in my parochial education I was told
again and again that the church on earth “is not of this world” and, therefore,
likely to be subjected to continual attack and constant warfare challenging its
survival; that it cannot rely on temporal or territorial success.
As one nun, a Sister of St. Francis once told me, “The enemies of the church have saved the church time and time
again. Why, if it had not been for the
likes of Martin Luther and the Protestant Reformation, it is difficult to imagine where we
would be today!”
That pattern is found most clearly in the first stage of the church. From the moment of its existence, the church
became involved in a life-and-death struggle between the persecution of the Roman Empire, and finding a separate identity from its Judaic Hellenistic ancestral roots.
After
three centuries of conflict, the church was victorious and the Roman Empire
became Christian with the conversion of Emperor Constantine. Almost immediately, however, the church had
to face a new enemy in the form of a Christian heresy known as “Arianism.” Monk Arius (256 – 336 A.D.) was an ascetic
Christian presbyter of Libyan birth, possibly of Berber extraction, and priest
in Alexandria, Egypt, of the church of the Baucalis.
Arius
and the Deity of Christ
Arius
was a tall, handsome, earnestly religious cleric, and eloquent in his
arguments. He gave the impression also of being arrogant. He lived at a time when the Eastern Church
was divided because of the Christological dispute which he was instrumental in
starting. He taught that Christ is not divine, but created.
Arius
was strongly opposed by his bishop Alexander, who was bishop of Alexandria (Egypt) from
313 AD. Alexander insisted that the Son was fully and truly God in as absolute
a sense as the Father was. The problem for Alexander was to show that this
(orthodox) truth did not lead to a belief in two Gods, as Arius maintained that
it did.
Alexander
assembled a council of Egyptian bishops in 320 A.D., which deposed Arius for heresy.
Arius, however, was not ready to give up without a fight, and went to
Palestine, canvassing support from other Eastern bishops. He wrote letters to Lucian’s ex-students who
were now presbyters or bishops, addressing them as “Dear fellow-pupils of
Lucian.” Lucian’s views of Christ seem to have been similar to that of Arius.
All
came to a head when Emperor Constantine I, to safeguard the unity of the empire
and the church, convened the First Council of Nicaea, which declared the Son to
be equal with the Father and issued the Nicene Creed (which we know today as the "Apostles Creed"), saying that Christ is “God
from God, true God from true God, only begotten Son (Jesus Christ) not created,
of the same essence as the Father....”
This
Nicene Creed is fundamental to Catholicism to this day, and is known with the opening lines: “I believe in God, the Father
Almighty, Creator of Heaven and Earth, and in Jesus Christ, His only Son, our
Lord ……” (Durant 1944)
Those
many years ago all but two of Arius’s supporters, Secundus of Ptolemais and
Theonas of Marmarica, gave in and signed the Nicaea Creed. Arius refused. These
three were sent into exile by Emperor Constantine. They were anathema to the church and
condemned.
To
make emphatic the decisions of the Council, Constantine introduced the death
penalty for disobedience, and ordered the burning of all books composed by Arius and
deposed Eusebius of Nicomedia and another bishop who had been active in their
support of Arius.
The
dispute, though, continued throughout the fourth and fifth century. The heresy
named after Arius was based on his teachings that the Father alone is God. The
Logos or Son was a created being and there was a time when the Son had not
existed.
According
to Arius, the Son was the first and greatest of all that God had created; He
was closer to God than all others, and the rest of creation related to God
through the Son (for instance, God had created everything else through Christ).
By
developing this arch-heresy, Arius thought he was defending the fundamental
truth that there is only one God - monotheism. A belief in the full deity of
Christ, he supposed, would mean the Father and Son were two separate Gods,
which contradicted the many statements of the Bible about God’s oneness.
His reasoning: if God the Father is Absolute, unbegotten,
and eternal unity, then “the only begotten Son (Jesus Christ) is then
subordinate and inferior as “there is a time when the Son was not” (Harvey 1964).
Arius
was also unhappy with Origen’s idea that there could be ‘degrees’ or ‘grades’
of divinity, with the Son being slightly less divine than the Father (this
became known after the Nicene Council as semi-Arianism).
Arius
argued that since the Father is clearly God, it follows that the Son could not
be God - so He must be a created being. Seventeen centuries later, Arianism is having a rebirth.
First
Age of the Church Not Following a Precedence
The
church was creating something absolutely new.
Hence, its initial phase, the Apostolic Age, stands apart in church
history as the archetype (ideal type) of spiritual creativity.
In that moment, the creative activity of the
church was inseparable from the actual creation of the church itself. So, Pentecost was at once the birthday of the
church and the beginning of the church’s apostolate.
Moreover, the new born church was faced
almost at once with a second change of more revolutionary significance than any
it would subsequently face, the required departure from the apostolate of a small
provincial Jewish state to a much larger Gentile dominated environment with massive
conversions across cosmopolitan urban centers in the Mediterranean basin from
Antioch, where it all started, to Rome itself, where it would take root.
We
have an account of this change in the “Acts of the Apostles” in the New
Testament. This gives us an invaluable
insight into the beginnings of the church from a Gentile perspective. Unfortunately, we possess no such comparable
account of the change from the Judaic-Christian point of view.
The
main achievement of the first age of the church was the successful penetration
of the dominant urban Roman-Hellenistic culture. Although the church remained outside civic
influence and authority for several generations, and existed with few if any
legal or political rights, being intermittently subjected to persecution and discriminating practices including unlawful incarceration, it became the greatest creative force
in the Roman world in the third to fifth century while Rome itself was
unraveling.
The
church created a new Christian art and a parallel society to that of Rome’s, a
culture that would survive and flourish in monasteries across Europe after the
collapse of Rome and the nearly thousand years of what has come to be known as "The Dark Middle Ages.”
The
Dark Middle Ages
This
Medieval period lasted from the 5th to the 15th century. It began with the
collapse of the Western Roman Empire and merged into the Renaissance and the
Age of Discovery.
The
Dark Middle Ages is the middle period of the three traditional divisions of
Western history: Antiquity, Medieval period, and Modern period. The Medieval
period is itself subdivided into the Early, the High, and the Late Middle Ages.
Depopulation,
de-urbanization, invasion, and movement of peoples, which had begun in Late
Antiquity, continued in the Early Middle Ages. The barbarian invaders,
including various Germanic peoples, formed new kingdoms in what remained of the
Western Roman Empire.
In
the 7th century, North Africa and the Middle East, once part of the Eastern
Roman Empire came under the rule of the Caliphate, an Islamic empire, after
conquest by Muhammad's successors. Although there were substantial changes in
society and political structures, the break with Antiquity was not complete.
The still expansive Byzantine Empire survived in the east and remained a major
power.
The Empire's Law Code, the Code of Justinian, was rediscovered in Northern Italy in
1070 and became widely admired later in the Middle Ages.
In the West, most
kingdoms incorporated the few extant Roman institutions. Monasteries were founded
as campaigns continued to Christianize pagan Europe. The Franks, under the
Carolingian dynasty, briefly established an empire covering much of Western
Europe; the Carolingian Empire during the later 8th and early 9th century, but
it later succumbed to the pressures of internal civil wars combined with
external invasions. These were led by the Vikings from the north, Magyars from the east, and Saracens
from the south.
During
the High Middle Ages, which began after A.D. 1000, the population of Europe
increased greatly as technological and agricultural innovations allowed trade
to flourish and the Medieval Warm Period climate change allowed crop yields to
increase.
Manorialism,
or the organization of peasants into villages that owed rent and labor services
to the nobles, and feudalism, the political structure whereby knights and
lower-status nobles owed military service to their overlords in return for the
right to rent from lands and manors, were two of the ways society was organized
in the High Middle Ages.
The
Crusades, first launched in 1095, were military attempts by Western European
Christians to regain control of the Middle Eastern Holy Land from the Muslims.
Kings became the heads of centralized nation states, reducing crime and
violence but making the ideal of a unified Christendom more distant.
Intellectual life was marked by scholasticism, a philosophy that emphasized
joining faith to reason, and by the founding of universities. The theology of
Thomas Aquinas, the paintings of Giotto, the poetry of Dante and Chaucer, the
travels of Marco Polo, and the architecture of Gothic cathedrals such as
Chartres are among the outstanding achievements of this period.
The
Late Middle Ages was marked by difficulties and calamities including famine,
plague, and war, which much diminished the population of Western Europe;
between 1347 and 1350, the Black Death killed about a third of Europeans.
Controversy, heresy, and schism within the Church paralleled the interstate
conflict, civil strife, and peasant revolts that occurred in the kingdoms.
Cultural and technological developments transformed European society,
concluding the Late Middle Ages and beginning the early modern period.
Apart
from the religious significance of the church’s survival in that hostile
thousand year period, it is worthy to note from a sociological perspective that
the primitive church was not merely a sectarian cult-sect-organization but very
much a real society. From the church’s
beginning, largely due to the genius of Apostle Paul, the church possessed a
strong sense of social cohesion within its ranks and a highly developed
hierarchical order anchored to a vibrant priesthood.
Clement
and Origen, Tertullian and Cyprian
The
culture of the first age of the church reached its full maturity in the first
half of the third century with Clement and Origen in the East and Tertullian
and Cyprian in the West.
Titus
Flavius Clemens (c. 150 – 215 A.D.), known as Clement of Alexandria to
distinguish him from the earlier Clement of Rome, was a Christian theologian
who taught at the Catechetical School of Alexandria.
A convert to Christianity, Clement was an educated man who was familiar with classical Greek philosophy and
literature. As his three major works demonstrate, Clement was influenced by
Hellenistic philosophy to a greater extent than any other Christian thinker of
his time, and in particular by Plato and the Stoics.
His
secret works, which exist only in fragments, suggest that he was also familiar
with pre-Christian Jewish esotericism and Gnosticism.
In one of his works he
argued that Greek philosophy had its origin among non-Greeks, claiming that
both Plato and Pythagoras were taught by Egyptian scholars. Among his pupils were Origen and Alexander of
Jerusalem.
Clement
is regarded as a Church Father, like Origen. He is venerated as a saint in
Oriental Orthodoxy, Eastern Catholicism and Anglicanism. He was previously revered
in the Roman Catholic Church, but his name was removed from the Roman
Martyrology in 1586 by Pope Sixtus V on the advice of Baronius.
Quintus
Tertullianus, Anglicised as Tertullian (c. 160 – 225 A.D.), was a prolific
early Christian author from Carthage in the Roman province of Africa. He is the first Christian author to produce
an extensive corpus of Latin Christian literature. He also was a notable early
Christian apologist and a polemicist against heresy. Tertullian has been called
"The Father of Latin Christianity" and "the founder of Western
theology."
Though
conservative, he did originate and advance new theology to the early Church. He
is perhaps most famous for being the oldest extant Latin writer to use the term
Trinity (Latin: Trinitas), giving the oldest extant formulation of the
Trinitarian terminology later adopted at the First Council of Nicaea.
Other
Latin formulations that first appear in his work are "three persons, one
substance," which would become known as the Blessed Trinity, or Three Gods
in One Person, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost (Holy Spirit). He
wrote his trinitarian formula after becoming a Montanist.
Montanism, also known as the Cataphrygian
Heresy and the New Prophecy, was a heretical movement founded by the prophet
Montanus that arose in the Christian Church in Phrygia, Asia Minor, in the 2nd
century. Unlike many Church fathers,
however, Tertullian was never canonized by the Catholic Church, as several of
his later teachings directly contradicted the teachings of the Church.
Cyprian
(c. 200 – 258 A.D.) was bishop of Carthage and an important early Christian
writer, many of whose Latin works are extant. He was born around the beginning
of the 3rd century in North Africa, perhaps at Carthage, where he received a
classical education. After converting to Christianity, he became a bishop soon
after in 249. He was a controversial figure during his lifetime with strong pastoral
skills, but held firm to his views during the Novatianist heresy.
Novatianists
were early Christians followers of the Antipope, Novatian. They held a strict view of baptized
Christians who denied their faith or performed ritual sacrifices to pagan gods
under the duress of possible persecution by Emperor Decius in AD 250.
Novatian
was a Roman priest who in 251 A.D. opposed the election of Pope Cornelius,
following the assassination of Pope Fabian. This was a period of sporadic persecution of Christians, who could avoid such fate by tacitly paying homage to the Roman gods. Novatian found this behavior despicable, but Pope Cornelius even more so for being lax in accepting these lapsed Christians back into the fold.
He
allowed himself be made a rival pope, one of the first antipopes, holding that
lapsed Christians, who had not maintained a confession of faith under
persecution, could never again receive Holy Communion in the church. He also claimed second marriages to be
unlawful.
He
and his followers were excommunicated by a synod held in Rome that same year.
Novatian suffered martyrdom under the Emperor Valerian I
(253–60) at Carthage, which vindicated him and restored his reputation, proving his sanctity
in the eyes of the Church. His skillful Latin rhetoric led to his being
considered the preeminent Latin writer of Western Christianity until Jerome
and Augustine.
Given
these high charged personalities and the violent clashes of ideas, surprisingly, the third
phase of cultural retreat and disintegration that would mark the later years of
every other age of the church henceforth, did not dissuade the momentum of the First Age of the Church.
Events were overshadowed by the
vast catastrophe of the last great persecution, which threatened to destroy the
existence of the church, but, paradoxically, ended in the church’s greatest
achievement. This is how historian Will
Durant records the period:
The
Diocletian (Roman Emperor) was the greatest test and triumph of the
church. It weakened Christianity for a
time through the natural defection of adherents who had joined it, or grown up,
during a half century of unmolested prosperity.
But soon the defaulters were doing penance and pleading for readmission
to the fold. Accounts of the loyalty of
martyrs who had died, or of “confessors” who had suffered for the faith were
circulated from community to community; and these Acta Martyrum, intense with
exaggeration and fascinating with legend, played a historic role in awakening
or confirming Christian belief. “The
blood of martyrs,” said Tertullian, “is seed.”
There is no greater drama in human record than the sight of a few
Christians, scorned or oppressed by a succession of emperors, bearing all
trials with a fierce tenacity, multiplying quietly, building order while the
enemies generated chaos, fighting the sword with the word, brutality with hope,
and at last defeating the strongest state that history has known. Caesar and Christ had met in the arena, and
Christ had won (Durant
1944).
The
Second Age of the Church
The
Second Age of the Church begins with the most spectacular of all the external
victories that Christendom has known, the conversion of Emperor Constantine to
the Christian faith with Rome the new Christian capital of the Christian
emerging empire.
This
marked the beginning of Christendom in the sense of a political society or
group of societies which had found their principle of unity in the public
profession of the Christian faith.
There
is also the Byzantine culture in the East, which was now in the process of
translating the Hellenistic culture of the Roman Empire into Christian
terms. Both Christianity East and West
were to endure. Emperor Constantine
formed an alliance of the Church and State in the West and Emperor Theodosius
did the same in the East.
The
next three centuries, between the peace of the church and the Moslem conquest
of Jerusalem, Antioch and Alexandria, have an internal unity and
coherence. This has been known as the
“Age of the Fathers,” as both the Eastern and Western church looked back
on this period as the classical age of Christian thought and the fountainhead
of theological wisdom (Hoare 1954).
It
should be pointed out that the Fathers were not systemic theologians in the
sense of Thomas Aquinas, but were successful in forcing the mind of the church
to norms of theological thought which were to be followed.
This
resulted in massive creative achievement with the rise and development of
Christian monasticism which would have immense influence on the Christian
culture. Monasticism is a religious way
of life in which one renounces worldly pursuits to devote oneself fully to
spiritual work.
Monastic
life plays an important role in many Christian churches, especially in the
Catholic and Orthodox traditions. Similar forms of religious life also exist in
other faiths, most notably in Buddhism, but also in Hinduism and Jainism,
although the expressions differ considerably.
Males
pursuing a monastic life are generally called monks while female monastics are
called nuns. Many monks and nuns live in monasteries to stay away from the
secular world. Yet, monastics differ between and within Christian
traditions. As a general rule, in Roman Catholicism, monks and nuns are called
brother or sister, while in Orthodox Christianity, they are called father or
mother.
From
a social psychological perspective, though monasticism spread with
extraordinary swiftness across Europe and Eurasia, it retained the imprint of
its earlier origins in that the intimacy of small groups clustered in isolation
outside the mainstream of society were tantamount to sealing off a belief system with the Christian imprimatur.
In
the Dark Middle Ages, monasteries and convents were citadels where nuns and
brothers industriously preserved Western culture and knowledge while outside in an ocean of despair Western
civilization took a thousand year hiatus.
This
period was also marked by the flowering of Christian art and architecture, and
liturgical poetry. During the Age of Emperor
Justinian every aspect of
social and artistic life was subject to Christian influence. Yet, already the spiritual vitality of the
age was beginning to flag. It was
evident that the Eastern and Western churches were not on the same course.
During
the last phase of the period, there developed an open schism between
Constantinople (now Istanbul) and Rome.
Finally, the “Age of the Fathers” ended in the loss of the Christian
East and the establishment of the new world power of Islam…….
No comments:
Post a Comment