THE
JESUS STORY (continued)
SEARCH
FOR THE REAL PARENTS OF MY SOUL
James
R. Fisher, Jr., Ph.D.
©
January 13, 2015
RELIGIOUS
RIVALS FOR THE ALLEGIANCE OF THE GRECO-ROMAN WORLD
The
conditions were favorable for a new religion, but the competition was
fierce. Christianity, by comparison, did
not appear to have an outside chance of surviving. Indeed, at its outset, Christianity seemed to
be one of the least of many rivals with little promise of success against the
others.
We
cannot undertake this social psychological odyssey without naming contenders in
Jesus’ day, when the complexity of religious allegiance became so intense in
the Mediterranean basin.
Over
time, scholars, pseudo-scholars, skeptics, agnostics, atheists and Christian
apologists have written weighty tomes from every conceivable aspect and vantage
point to support or deny the validity of Christianity.
This
personal odyssey represents but the tiniest blip on the iceberg of that
compelling inquiry. So, it is not to be
construed as seeking company with this community of scholars, but rather to
represent the author’s journey for closure, that is, for a better understanding of his
roots, his culture, indeed, himself in these times. Hopefully, in that sense, it will help the
reader better appreciate his own spiritual roots which have a long history even if
these roots are not acknowledged.
Ideas
first taken to be exclusively Christian may be shown to have had an earlier
antecedence. As we go forward, the many
facets in the family of man and his hunger for spiritual connection are on
display.
* *
*
Some
cults, more than two thousand years ago, were maintained by the state. These included the gods of Rome. The Roman Empire was an aggregation of city
states, many in existence before the formation of the Empire and were
autonomous. Each felt dependent upon the
favors of its gods and saw to it that the worship of the state’s official
divinities was strictly maintained.
As
previously covered, the state religions were no longer believed, yet the
continuance of their rites was understood to be prudent for the welfare of
society. Draconian measures were imposed
to see that the pomp and circumstance of the rites was not compromised.
Outstanding
among the officially supported cults was that of the Emperor, who was treated
as a god. The East had long been
familiar with a ruler who was also a divinity as Alexander the Great
experienced in his eastern conquests. It
was natural that Caesar Augustus, who had brought about peace to the
Mediterranean, would be hailed as an incarnation of divinity. Statues of Augustus were erected across the
empire and religious ceremonies instituted to treat him as a god.
Caesar
Augustus went along with this as he regarded it as a safeguard of law and
order, and important for the realm’s preservation and prosperity. Dissent from this divine adoration might well
be interpreted as tantamount to treason.
Prominent,
too, at the time were the so-called “mystery religions.” They were secret in many of their ceremonies,
and their members swore an oath not to reveal the esoteric nature of their
beliefs.
After
a few centuries, many of these religions disappeared only to find many of their
tenets reappear in some new religions.
Cults were known to copy one another and to provide an easy going
syncretism, which ultimately produced fuzzy distinctions. Not the least of these faiths to owe a serious
debt to mystery religions was Christianity.
Several
of these mystery religions were built around Dionysus. According to the story told about him,
Zagreus, the son of Zeus by Persephone, was born in the form of a bull. He was destined to rule the world, but was
torn apart and eaten by the jealous Titans.
But
Athens saved his heart, Zeus swallowed it, and when Semele born Dionysus to
Zeus, Dionysus was Zagreus reborn. He
was also often given the name Bacchus.
The bull is associated with fertility cults.
One
of the coarser mysteries of Dionysus has devotees drinking the fruit of the
vine with Dionysus as Bacchus. Bacchus
was the god of wine as well as of animals and vegetable life.
Devotees
of this cult also ate of the flesh of a newly slain bull still dripping blood,
and thus saw it as partaking in the life of the god. They engaged in sacred dances as well, which
induced ecstasy and in which they were supposedly possessed by the spirit of
the god (Watts 1961. 1964, 1972).
These
mystery religious are having a rejuvenation today. Young people are looking for the same answers
as these searchers did nearly 2,000 years ago (Frazer 1907). Among these mysteries were those associated
with Magna Mater, or the Great Mother, who loved the virgin-born of the shepherd,
Attis. Attis died, slain either by his
enemies or by his own hand. If the
latter be the case, it has been deemed by emasculation (Cumont 1903).
The
Magna Mother mourned the passing of her son, Attis, and then effected his
resurrection, as he became immortal.
Postulants of the Magna Mother in full-fledged initiation mourned Attis,
and then, at the climax of a wild dance, emasculated themselves. This was followed by a day in which the
resurrection of Attis was celebrated, as the devotees now felt themselves
united with Attis, willing participants in his immortality.
Somewhat
similar cults had as their center a young god whom the Greeks called Adonis,
and who died and rose again. In like
manner, another set of mysteries clustered around the myth of Osiris, a king
who had been killed by his brother. His widow, Isis, in mourning sought him,
found his body, revived it, and became ruler of the dead. In the religion that developed around this
myth, Serapis replaced Osiris and Isis was deified. The chief shrine was the Serapeum in
Alexandria, Egypt.
The
Eleusinian mysteries developed near Athens which had the focus of their rites
on the death of vegetation in the autumn and winter, and the resurrection of
life again in the spring. This was done
through the nature myth of Persephone who was carried off by Hades to the
underworld, was sought by her mourning mother, Demeter, was restored to the
world of light, but was compelled to return to the underworld for part of each
year (Guthrie 1935).
Widespread
was the mystery religion which had Mithra for its main figure (Cumont
1903). Mithra, a god of Persian origin,
was usually represented as bestriding a bull and slaying it. From the dying bull issued the seed of life
for the world, and hence the act became the symbol of regeneration. The cult practiced baptism and had a
sacramental meal. Its membership was
restricted to men and its places of worship, crypts or underground caverns,
were too small to accommodate more than a few members at a time.
Most
mystery cults eventually made their way to Rome. They also penetrated much of the Empire along
the Mediterranean coastlines. Their
appeal seems to have been the simple assurance of immortality, which the
religion gave its members combined with a fellowship that many in the world
craved as large numbers of people were uprooted and disenfranchised from their
birth homes.
There
were many competitors for spiritual dominion and dominance. Judaism was among the most formidable of the
religious groups vying for the favor of the peoples of the Roman Empire. As a faith, Judaism identified with one ethnic
group, stressing its belief that Israel was a peculiar people that had been
especially chosen by God. With this
manifest, Judaism could scarcely hope to win all of the human race even if it
so desired, which it didn’t.
Some
of the Jewish prophets had regarded Judaism as having a universal mission and
destined to embrace all men in its fellowship.
Yet, the majority of Jews did not follow such prophecy. As we have shown, Jewish communities were
numerous and widely scattered as the Jewish scriptures had been translated into
Greek, and thousands of non-Jews were attracted to the faith. They sought either full incorporation into
Judaism or became a fringe group practicing many of the tenets in the Jewish
belief system without formal acceptance.
Judaism,
alas, then as now was not a proselytizing faith, whereas Christianity has
proven to be very much such a religion. Since the time of Apostle Paul,
Christianity has been in the vigorous and demanding business of selling its
rationale to the world of ideas. The
distillate of this marketing strategy centered on the power of the crucifixion
of Jesus and His resurrection, as it captured the imagination of the known
world.
JESUS
AND PARALLEL CRUCIFIED SAVIORS
Paul
instinctively knew the most dramatic incident in the life of Jesus was his
crucifixion. This would suggest that he
was familiar parallel pagan "crucified saviors,” such as Adonis, Attis,
Baal, Bacchus, Balder, Beddru, Devatat, Dionysus, Hermes, Horus, Krishna,
Mithras, Orpheus, Osiris, Tammuz, Thor and Zoroaster
The
Crucifixion of Jesus Christ, then, shares this phenomenon with many other
crucified saviors who are reported to have died and again risen as gods. As a consequence, Christianity is rivaled by
many pagan “mystery” religions.
Those
who would refute the Jesus story claim: (1) Jesus of Nazareth didn't exist as a
person in history (also called "mythicism"); and (2) the events of
Christ's life in the Gospels were copied from "previous saviors" of
non-Christian pagan religions.
The
prominent three "parallel pagan" gods appear to be Dionysus, Mithras,
and Osiris. Most Christians, indeed, most well-read skeptics and atheists are
unfamiliar with Greek, Roman, Persian or Egyptian religions and deities. So the
argument goes that all these gods and religions are based on myths, fables, or
legends with the Jesus story on a par with Dionysus, Mithras, and Osiris.
If
one has taken a mythology, comparative religion or humanities course in
college, these gods would be talked about. However, the information on them is
readily available in any scholarly encyclopedia. A better source is the
multi-volume The Encyclopedia of Religion (1987) edited by Mircea Eliade or the
2005 second edition edited by Lindsay Jones.
If interested, it is well to check your local public or university
library for the relevant scholarship.
This is necessary to separate the "wheat" from the "chaff"
(Matt 3:12; Luke 3:17).
As
skeptic Richard Carrier puts it:
"You'll
have someone make up a fake quote, or misrepresent a document, misrepresent the
evidence. Then they'll put it on a web site, or put it in a book that's
published by what people think is a respectable publisher. And then hundreds,
thousands of Christians will read this and believe it because they assume, well
this guy wouldn't lie. He wouldn't have made this stuff up. And so they go and
repeat it. And so you get the lie repeated many times, mostly by people who
aren't lying, who really do think it's true but just didn't check"
(Richard 2005).
So,
it is a critical point in this odyssey as to the validity of the Jesus story
compared to these pagan crucified saviors.
This "parallel pagan" argument critical of Christianity by
hyper-skeptics, atheists, agnostics, or Christian apologists is widely
available on the Internet, or in the 19th century pseudo-historical work of
Kersey Graves, The World's Sixteen Crucified Saviors (1875). Graves (DVD) sees overlapping claims:
“(All
these gods) received divine honors, nearly all worshiped as Gods, or sons of
God, and were incarnated as Christs, Saviors, Messiahs, or Mediators. A few reputedly born of virgins; some of a
character nearly identical to that ascribed to Jesus in the Christian bible;
many reported to have been crucified; and all taken together, furnish a
prototype and parallel for nearly every important incident and wonder-inciting
miracle, doctrine and precept recorded in the New Testament, of the Christian's
Savior” (Graves 1875).
Graves
himself accepted the historicity of Jesus Christ as he was not in the strictest
sense, a "mythicist." His
hypothesis is that these various godmen were all 'historical personages' who
patterned themselves after this archetype; that these various crucified saviors
and godmen were 'real people' who were deified with fairy tales and myths added
to their biographies (Graves 1875).
Richard
Carrier disavows Kersey Graves as a reliable source and doesn't think much of
the concept of "parallel pagan" gods.
He claims the supposed
"parallels" that either pre- or post-date Christianity's founding
lack reliable historical evidence in support of the idea, and thus concludes
the "parallel" concept is simply mistaken (Carrier 2005).
Should
we accept that "The World's Sixteen Crucified Saviors: Or Christianity
Before Christ” is unreliable, the fact remains that no comprehensive critique
exists. Most scholars recognize many of his findings are unsupported. In general, even when the evidence is real,
it often appears many years after Christianity began, and thus might be
evidence of diffusion in the other direction (Carrier, 2005).
That
said there are other similar savior figures in the same neighborhood and at the
same time in history: Mithras, Attis, Adonis, Osiris, Tammuz, and so forth, and
nobody thinks that these characters are anything but mythical with most stories
having some kind of resurrection or another.
It
is that aspect of the Jesus story in the New Testament patterned after
"dying and rising gods" of antiquity that aggravates skeptics as that
story existed long before Christianity. This view became popular among scholars
during the so-called "history of religions" school at the turn of the
20th century.
The
category of "dying and rising gods," along with the pattern of its
mythic and ritual associations, received its earliest full formulation in the
influential work of Sir James G. Frazer (1856-1941) in The Golden Bough (1st
edition 1890 in two volumes, 2nd edition 1900 in three volumes, 3rd edition in
12 volumes, 1906-1915, with an abridged one-volume edition published in
1922). This level of dedication to this
idea has proven the legacy of anthropologist Frazer who is considered the
founder of this discipline.
This
theme was repeated by other scholars of mythology such as Joseph Campbell who
edited Pagan and Christian Mysteries (1955), and his more famous The Hero with
a Thousand Faces (originally 1949), whose views were made popular through a
1988 PBS series "The Power of Myth" interviews with Bill Moyers.
However, on the "dying and rising gods" motif the Encyclopedia of
Religion (1987) concludes:
"The
category of dying and rising gods, once a major topic of scholarly
investigation, must now be understood to have been largely a misnomer based on
imaginative reconstructions and exceedingly late or highly ambiguous
texts....In most cases, the decipherment and interpretation of texts in the
language native to the deity's cult has led to questions as to the applicability
of the category. The majority of evidence for Near Eastern dying and rising
deities occurs in Greek and Latin texts of late antiquity, usually
post-Christian in date" (Smith 1985).
Smith
is emphatic: "Some of these divine figures simply disappear, some
disappear only to return again in the near or distant future; some disappear
and reappear with monotonous frequency. All the deities that have been
identified as belonging to the class of dying and rising deities can be
subsumed under the two larger classes of disappearing deities or dying deities.
In the first case, the deities return but have not died; in the second case,
the gods die but do not return. There is no unambiguous instance in the history
of religions of a dying and rising deity."
Paul
Rhodes Eddy and Gregory A. Boyd state in The Jesus Legend (2007):
"While
the claim that aspects of the Christian view of Jesus parallel, even are
indebted to, ancient pagan legends and myths has a long history, it gained
prominence with the birth of the history of religions school in the late
nineteenth and early twentieth centuries....The history of religions school was
extremely popular in academic circles for several decades, but owing to
trenchant critiques by such scholars as Samuel Cheetham, H.A.A. Kennedy, J.
Gresham Machen, A.D. Nock, Bruce Metzger, and Gunter Wagner, it eventually fell
out of fashion."
Although
the category was largely abandoned by most reputable scholars and historians by
the mid-20th century, there are exceptions. Tryggve N. D. Mettinger of Lund
University in Sweden, wrote a recent (2001) scholarly critique challenging the
modern consensus and attempts to "resurrect" the dying and rising
theme. He nonetheless admits:
"There
is now what amounts to a scholarly consensus against the appropriateness of the
concept of dying and rising gods. Those who still think differently are looked
upon as residual members of an almost extinct species....The situation during
the last half of the century was thus one when it seemed fairly clear that
there were no ideas of resurrection connected with Dumuzi / Tammuz, and that
the ideas of a resurrection in connection with Adonis are very late.
The
references to a resurrection of Adonis have been dated mainly to the Christian
Era....Frazer's category was broad and all encompassing. To Frazer, Osiris,
Tammuz, Adonis, and Attis were all deities of the same basic type, manifesting
the yearly decay and revival of life. He explicitly identified Tammuz and
Adonis. The category of dying and rising deities as propagated by Frazer can no
longer be upheld" (Mettinger 2001).
The
category is still revived among the "free thought" community in the
non-scholarly form of Kersey Graves, sometimes in the revised James G. Frazer
The Golden Bough form as a valid argument against historical Christianity.
Evangelical
author Ronald Nash in The Gospel and The Greeks: Did the New Testament Borrow
from Pagan Thought? (2003 2nd edition) examines in Hellenistic philosophy, the
mystery religions, and Gnosticism and their relationship to early Christianity.
He concludes:
"Was
first-century Christianity a syncretistic religion? Was early Christianity a
synthesis of ideas and practices borrowed from different sources, some of them
pagan? To the extent that key words like dependence, influence, accommodation,
and borrowed are understood in a strong sense, my answer to this question will
be an unequivocal no"(Nash 2003).
In
chapters seven through eleven, he examines the various Greco-Roman mystery
religions and such pagan deities as Demeter, Dionysus / Bacchus, Orpheus, Isis
/ Osiris, Cybele / Attis, Mithra, Mithraism, and Zoroastrianism, along with
their supposed influence on the Christian sacraments and essential Christian
beliefs (e.g., the Incarnation, life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ),
which is a thorough Christian reply to the "parallel pagan" argument
or "copycat" thesis.
* *
*
NOTE:
We
now move on from this “Birth of Christianity,” realizing this is all being
considered in this secular Age of Information with the miracle of instant
global communication. Life over the last
century has been a test of the credulity of both Christian believers and
nonbelievers. For this author of the
Search for the Real Parents of My Soul, there is no recourse then to move on to
JESUS AND THE GOSPELS: THE FOUNDATION OF CHRISTIANITY. References not included here.
No comments:
Post a Comment